Wednesday 20 March 2019

“Fun? What's That?”

Carl Barks! The Good Duck Artist! I like him. Not as stratospherically as some people — I admire his influence on Disney comics at large, and I don't deny that he's a good writer and good artist, but he's not my favorite Disney author in either capacity. Still! A master of his craft he was, and having particularly liked a random story of his when I reread it yesterday, I thought to myself, Aristide, the world must know. Or at least I thought something vaguely in that direction. 


This is Fun? What's That?, from 1959, one of 'em short-form Scrooge/Gyro team-ups. Scrooge/Gyro isn't a very common ‘pairing’, but here and elsewhere it works rather well; showing that this is Barks and not some less ‘involved’ writer, Fun? What's That? is particularly concerned with drawing parallels between Scrooge & Gyro, implicitly justifying putting them in a story together. 

The concept of the story, as a seasoned reader could arguably deduce from the title alone, is that Scrooge and Gyro half-heartedly attempt to “have fun” the way normal people do, forbidden from inventing/doing money-related things. This is as the case may be prompted by an amusing misunderstanding at Dr Quacker's (Dr Quacker is a dognose, not an anthropomorphic duck, which feels a bit odd when he's got ‘Quack’ in his name; could Barks really have chosen a 'Quack' name purely based on the slang meaning, without taking a step back to consider that this was a duck story?), where he accidentally hears the Little Helper's buzzing instead of Gyro's heartbeat, and concludes that poor Gyro has ‘Puckeritis of the Pipeline’. He proceeds to send him off to the countryside, considering it his only chance. (I wonder, did the writer of the DuckTales Classic episode Scrooge's Last Adventure have this story in mind?)


Scrooge, who in a brilliant cheapness gag had been waiting for someone with the same symptoms as him (in this case, Gyro) to come along and pay for a consultation so he doesn't have to, tags along. Various sequences ensue (beach, bowling alley, and finally camping trip), during which Gyro and Scrooge can barely stop themselves from inventing things and counting things, respectively. The characterization of Scrooge as borderline-OCD like this is a bit odd, but kinda charming. 


(By the way, did you notice that Yogi Wisenik here — ah, Barks and the naming of incidental characters — is a human? The female fortune tellers in You Can't Guess and The Dainty Daredevil are also humans, which suggests that for some reason, the publisher's ban on human characters didn't extend to soothsayers. Huh. Wonder why.)

Barks appears to be treating the story as a Gyro one where Scrooge happens to tag along as a sidekick, and Barks Gyro story means background gags with the Little Helper. Those are always charming and endearing; you can see an example of the usual fare in the ‘yogi’ panel above. But it's more than background gags here: the Helper ends up playing a rather big role in the camping sequence. For example, Scrooge puts him to rather undignified use cooking sourdough biscuits (incidentally letting us readers know that the Helper's bulb-head produces signifcant heat; every day, something new!):


(I love, love, love this sequence more than I can articulate, with Scrooge's casual, cheerful abuse of the Helper, and the Helper's private grumbling, which I'll note is not enough to overwhelm his sense of duty about Being Helpful: note that despite the ‘Gripe, Gripe’-ing, he makes no attempts to extract himself from the dough.)

There's also his displaying the ability to flash brighter than usual at will, an ability he uses to chase all sorts of creatures out of the cave where Scrooge and Gyro are spending the night, and though I'm not convinced either by the idea that half these creatures would be sleeping together in the same cave, or the idea that bright lights would be enough to scare some of these off, it too is very charming.


He displays the same ability again after being, I kid you not, swallowed by a goddamn bear, and it goes from charming to surrealistically awesome. 


I'm not usually that much of a fan of whenever Barks drags bears into his stories — the way he draws them is always slightly unappealing to me — and somehow, that bear on the right, above, still looks more like an overweight wolf to me than a bear — but this sequence is nevertheless extremely funny to me. Don't know about you lot. 

Anyway, of course, they eventually decide “screw this, we're going back to work” (this makes more sense for Scrooge than it does for Gyro, who is still, by the story's logic, under the impression that he's suffering from a potentially-fatal heart disease; but oh well). All in good fun. 

So all in all, the story is predictable in concept and 'plot', from start to finish; but the execution, owing to Barks's talent, makes it into an extremely entertaining read, with a choice part for the Little Helper (always a plus) and an interesting, if not super-complex, venture into Scrooge and Gyro's psychologies. I fully recommend it. 

Post-Scriptum:
  • This is the panel where Scrooge and Gyro decide to go back to work. Focus on Gyro's line — is this all secretly a prequel to Picnic? Well… not quite, obviously. But you gotta figure that Gyro's attempts to improve camping will go significantly like his attempts to improve picnics in that other great Barks story. 




4 comments:

  1. “Fun? What’s That?”

    I’ll tell you what “Fun” is! “Fun” is reading a Blog post review of this great little story by Carl Barks! That’s what “Fun” is!

    Indeed, this would be my favorite short Barks story that is not a WDC&S “Ten-Pager”! Why? Because it is Carl Barks taking his two greatest original creations, and examining them in ways the long Scrooge adventures and the four-page Gyro shorts could not! And doing so in a way that could only happen if they teamed-up!

    Each one’s individual “obsession” is spotlighted by taking them OUT of their normal environments and throwing them together under an unfamiliar, yet self-imposed, restriction. Scrooge can’t “stop being Scrooge” and Gyro can’t “stop being Gyro”! And, unlike the same lesson that has been pounded-home in most heavy-handed, moralizing products of American-produced TV animation, forced upon every generation since the 1970s (including some produced by Disney), Scrooge and Gyro learn to “JUST BE THEMSELVES” in a humorous way that never once violates (or even “bends”) character!

    It is a thing of beauty, created by the single individual who knows those characters better than anyone! …Or, perhaps I should say “knew them”, as even Unca Carl may find his creations unrecognizable these days… especially if he were to read the flat and uninspired American English dialogue (the antithesis of how Barks wrote his scripts) that has plagued them in standard format comic books since the latter part of 2018!

    To some of your specific comments…

    I must disagree when you say about Barks “I like him. Not as stratospherically as some people — I admire his influence on Disney comics at large, and I don't deny that he's a good writer and good artist, but he's not my favorite Disney author in either capacity.”

    Carl Barks is very likely the reason that the Disney comic book became the world-wide phenomenon that it remains just about everywhere but, ironically, in his own country! Without him we have no Don Rosa, William Van Horn, and who knows how many other creators in other lands! I daresay both you and I probably don’t have our respective Blogs, and would never have communicated with each other. If you exclude only Floyd Gottfredson, no one has had a greater influence on this particular art form than “The Good Artist” - who was also a GREAT WRITER, the area in which *I* admire him most of all!

    Since Barks both designed and named “Dr. Quacker”, my guess would be that the name had more to do with a doctor practicing “quackery” than being a duck! If there were no “duck characters” in the story, this would be the reader’s first assumption.

    “(I wonder, did the writer of the DuckTales Classic episode Scrooge's Last Adventure have this story in mind?)”

    I seriously doubt it! It was far more influenced by THIS EPISODE OF TOP CAT! After all, it’s not as if the DT episode “Horse Scents” was not previously and quite clearly influenced by THIS EPISODE OF TOP CAT!

    And while DT’s writers certainly *did* read at least some of the Barks comics, “Fun? What’s That?”, not having appeared in an issue of UNCLE SCROOGE, was likely unknown to them!

    I believe only “realistic humans” such as those in Barks’ “Dangerous Disguise” were banned. We see “cartoony humans” in these comics more so than I feel we ought to.

    Finally, there should have been MANY MORE Scrooge and Gyro team-ups! They work well together in unique ways that his nephews do not. HERE is one such team-up that I wrote about back in my fanzine days, and later repurposed for my Blog!

    Keep up the great stuff like this! Even when I am unable to comment, I enjoy it all!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Always nice to hear from you!

    Yes, the very sentence that you quoted acknowledges that you can't help but admire Barks for the influence he's had on the medium. I was simply noting, with that caveat, that this did not mean he was my favorite; much like, say, one can be very glad the grimmer, sketchier first Seasons of Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea or Doctor Who or Lost in Space exist, but purely in terms of taste, prefer the later, wackier days.

    Similarly, I can well see that the “Doctor Quacker” name is a pun on ‘being a quack’. I just think it's a bit odd to choose that pun and then apply it to a dognose; because you'd expect the double meaning of ‘quack’ to have been very well-known to Barks. Oh well. If we can have ‘Duckworth’ and ‘Albert Quackmore’, who knows.

    Finally, there should have been MANY MORE Scrooge and Gyro team-ups!” I quite agree!

    ReplyDelete
  3. "Yes, the very sentence that you quoted acknowledges that you can't help but admire Barks for the influence he's had on the medium. I was simply noting, with that caveat, that this did not mean he was my favorite; much like, say, one can be very glad the grimmer, sketchier first Seasons of Voyage to the Bottom of the Sea or Doctor Who or Lost in Space exist, but purely in terms of taste, prefer the later, wackier days. "

    VERY nicely put! And, yes... I DO indeed prefer those "later, wackier days"!

    Just curious, and I say this not nearly having the background in European Disney comics that you do - but having seen vary many of them in the last few decades, who "actually beats" Barks?

    Rosa, perhaps... and only at times! Be he wouldn't be, if not for Barks!

    I can actually declare a preference for Casty's Mickey Mouse, over Romano Scarpa and my sainted Paul Murry... and, in specific instances, even over Gottfredson!

    But who, in your opinion, really and truly outdoes Barks at the game he pretty much invented?

    ...Not a "challenge", but an honest question!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Writer is a somewhat tougher call, but as artists go, the first and most obvious answer has gotta be Marco Rota.

    ReplyDelete

“The War Wagon”

The first thing about the 1967 John Wayne/Kirk Douglas vehicle The War Wagon   (yes, that pun was intentional, thank you)  is that it has o...